Table of Contents Why should I care? What should I do? What should I know?

Putting down roots in earthquake country (a service of SCEC)



Earthquake Shaking

Magnitude is a measurement of the energy produced by an earthquake and is not a measure of the shaking you feel. What you feel is very complex — hard or gentle, long or short, jerky or rolling — and is not describable with one number. Aspects of the motion are described by the velocity (how fast the ground is moving), acceleration (how quickly the speed of the ground is changing), the frequency (seismic waves vibrate at different frequencies just like sound waves), and the duration (how long the strong shaking lasts). What you feel in an earthquake is controlled by three main factors: magnitude, distance, and local soil conditions.

Magnitude

Typically you will feel more intense shaking from a big earthquake than from a small one. Bigger earthquakes also release their energy over a larger area and for a longer period of time.

An earthquake begins at a hypocenter, and from there the rupture front travels along the fault, producing waves all the time it is moving. Every point crossed by the rupture front gives off shaking, so longer faults produce bigger earthquakes that have longer durations. The actual durations of 15 earthquakes are shown on the previous page. For a magnitude 5 event, the actual process of rupturing the fault is over in a few seconds, although you might continue to feel shaking for longer because some waves reach you after they bounce and echo within the earth.

The magnitude 7.8 earthquake on the San Andreas fault in 1857 ruptured almost 360 kilometers (220 miles) of the fault. At 3 kilometers (2 miles) per second, it took two minutes for that length of fault to rupture, so you would have felt shaking for several minutes. If the idea of a two-minute earthquake frightens you, remember that some of the energy will be traveling from 400 kilometers (250 miles) away. In most cases, only the 10 - 15 seconds of shaking that originates from the part of the fault nearest you will be very strong.

The 2001 Nisqually (M6.8) and 1994 Northridge (M6.7) earthquakes shown above provide an interesting example of how distance from an earthquake affects the level of shaking experienced. Even though the Nisqually earthquake was slightly larger than the Northridge earthquake on the magnitude scale, the resulting damage was far less. One reason is that the section of fault that moved was much deeper than the fault that moved in the Northridge earthquake. Therefore every house was at least 50 kilometers (30 miles) away the fault.

Distance

Earthquake waves diminish in intensity as they travel through the ground, so earthquake shaking is less intense farther from the fault.

Low-frequency waves diminish less rapidly with distance than do high-frequency waves (just as you can hear low-pitched noises from farther away than you can high-pitched noises). If you are near an earthquake, you will experience all the shaking produced by the earthquake and feel "jolted." Farther away, the higher frequencies will have died away and you will feel a rolling motion.

The amount of damage to a building does not depend solely on how hard it is shaken. In general, smaller buildings such as houses are damaged more by higher frequencies, so usually houses must be relatively close to the hypocenter to be severely damaged. Larger structures such as high-rises and bridges are damaged more by lower frequencies and will be more noticeably affected by the largest earthquakes, even at considerable distances. The shaking dies off with distance more quickly in the western United States than in the older, more rigid crust of the eastern United States.

Local soil conditions

Soils can greatly amplify the shaking in an earthquake. Passing from rock to soil, seismic waves slow down but get bigger. Hence a soft, loose soil may shake more intensely than hard rock at the same distance from the same earthquake. An extreme example for this type of amplification was in the Marina district of San Francisco during the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. That earthquake was 100 kilometers (60 miles) from San Francisco, and most of the Bay Area escaped serious damage. However, some sites in the Bay Area on landfill or soft soils experienced significant shaking. This amplified shaking was one of the reasons for the the collapse of the elevated Nimitz freeway. Ground motion at those sites was more that 10 times stronger than at neighboring sites on rock.

The same factors also apply to areas covered by thick sediment — such as the Los Angeles basin in Southern California where sediments can be as much as 10 kilometers (6 miles) thick. Shaking from an earthquake in the region can be 5 or more times greater at a site in the basin than the level of shaking in the nearby mountains.

Earthquake Ground-Motion Amplification in Southern California

Relative Shaking in Future Earthquakes
In these images of the Los Angeles Basin, the lowest layer shows the depth of sedimentary basins, and the middle layer shows the softness of near-surface rocks and sediments. The top layer is the total amplification expected in future earthquakes because these features.

P.S.

Several other factors can affect shaking. Earthquake waves do not travel evenly in all directions from the rupture surface; the orientation of the fault and the direction of movement can change the characteristics of the waves in different directions. This is called the radiation pattern. When the earthquake rupture moves along the fault, it focuses energy in the direction it is moving so that a location in that direction will receive more shaking than a site at the same distance from the fault but in the opposite direction. This is called directivity.


download PDF order free copy


en español